|
Philosophy 322 – Critical Thinking about the Paranormal For detailed examples of
good and bad writing, see my booklet Student
Success Guide: Writing Skills, available free online at http://www.skepdic.com/refuge/writingskills.pdf
For more resources to help with your writing, you might try the SCC online writing lab (OWL) or the Purdue University OWL. Late papers will be downgraded
one letter grade. Topic: The second paper will describe how the common hindrances
to critical thinking (cognitive and perceptual illusions and biases) that
make evaluating experiences difficult also make it difficult to design and
control scientific experiments in psi.
In addition to the biases already discussed there are problems with
such things as sensory leakage, improper randomization, and misuse of
statistics. One particularly annoying
problem in psi research has been the problem of cheating, but self-deception
by investigators has also been a problem. Also, certain assumptions have been
traditionally made by psi researchers, e.g., that performance in guessing
experiments that exceeds chance odds according to some statistical formula
for significance is taken as strong evidence for the paranormal. Radin
believes the issue of replication has been solved by meta-analysis. How
justified are these assumptions? Discuss some of the problems with psi
experiments that have occurred during the past 150 years or so. Length: 1,500 words maximum (6 pages, typed and double-spaced) You may use
other sources besides Radin and Carroll for this paper, but it is neither
required nor expected. In-text references should follow this example: Your list of sources should follow this example:
Carroll, Robert T. (2003). The Skeptic’s Dictionary: A Collection of
Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions. Wiley &
Sons.
Christopher, Milbourne. (1970). ESP, Seers &
Psychics. Thomas Y. Crowell Co. Format:
Use page numbers. The first page of text should be numbered at the bottom
center. Following pages should be in the upper right corner. Use a title page
and try to center it on the page. It should include the paper title, your
name, your teacher’s name, the title of the course, and the date. Follow the
example below: From Experience to
Experiment Maria Chavez for Dr. Robert T. Carroll Philosophy 322 –
Critical Thinking about the Paranormal |
back to Philosophy 322: Critical Thinking about the Paranormal